Citrix Releases Security Updates for SD-WAN WANOP
Citrix releases IoC scanner for ADC and Gateway vulnerabilities
CVE-2019-19781, what you should know and how to fix your Citrix ADC, Access Gateway and SD-WAN WANOP - Poppelgaard.com
GitHub - mpgn/CVE-2019-19781: CVE-2019-19781 - Remote Code Execution on Citrix ADC Netscaler exploit
Checklist for Citrix ADC CVE-2019-19781 – Deyda.net
Superevr on Twitter: "@ItsReallyNick req method doesn't matter either, as req method can be set to NULL and still imitate a GET" / Twitter
Nice Try: 501 (Ransomware) Not Implemented | FireEye Inc
CVE-2019-19781 - Vulnerability in Citrix Application Delivery Controller, Citrix Gateway, and Citrix SD-WAN WANOP appliance
CVE-2019-19781, what you should know and how to fix your Citrix ADC, Access Gateway and SD-WAN WANOP - Poppelgaard.com
Ver 1.3 finding evidence of itself causing false positive · Issue #24 · mandiant/ioc-scanner-CVE-2019-19781 · GitHub
CITRIX NETSCALER THREAT ACTOR WALKTHROUGH
IoC Scanner shows if Citrix appliances have been compromised via CVE-2019- 19781 - Help Net Security
Nice Try: 501 (Ransomware) Not Implemented | Mandiant
GitHub - mpgn/CVE-2019-19781: CVE-2019-19781 - Remote Code Execution on Citrix ADC Netscaler exploit
Citrix ADC and Gateway Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (CVE-2019-19781)
In the wake of CVE-2019-19781 vulnerability…and the lessons learned - Tales from the field
CVE-2019-19781
A Second Look at CVE-2019-19781 (Citrix NetScaler / ADC) – Fox-IT International blog
25 способов как китайские хакеры хотят поиметь серверы планеты. Успей быстрее. – Telegraph
CVE-2019-19781, what you should know and how to fix your Citrix ADC, Access Gateway and SD-WAN WANOP - Poppelgaard.com
PHP-Webshell · Issue #11 · mandiant/ioc-scanner-CVE-2019-19781 · GitHub
IoC Scanner shows if Citrix appliances have been compromised via CVE-2019- 19781 - Help Net Security
![Nick Carr on Twitter: "@superevr Very interesting. Need to test/verify, but fixed: https://t.co/YJhiggSjvg \]\s\"[A-Z]{3,7}\s[^\s]*/(v|%76)(p|%70)(n|%6e)(s|%73)/[^\s]*\.(x|%[57]8)(m|%[46]d)(l|%[46]c)[^\s]*\sHTTP/1\.1\"\s(200|304) Good? 🤩 I will DM to ...](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EO5OPFDX4AIIQMt?format=jpg&name=large "Nick Carr on Twitter: \"@superevr Very interesting. Need to test/verify, but fixed: https://t.co/YJhiggSjvg \]\s\\"[A-Z]{3,7}\s[^\s]*/(v|%76)(p|%70)(n|%6e)(s|%73)/[^\s]*\.(x|%[57]8)(m|%[46]d)(l|%[46]c)[^\s]*\sHTTP/1\.1\\"\s(200|304) Good? 🤩 I will DM to ...")
Nick Carr on Twitter: "@superevr Very interesting. Need to test/verify, but fixed: https://t.co/YJhiggSjvg \]\s\"[A-Z]{3,7}\s[^\s]*/(v|%76)(p|%70)(n|%6e)(s|%73)/[^\s]*\.(x|%[57]8)(m|%[46]d)(l|%[46]c)[^\s]*\sHTTP/1\.1\"\s(200|304) Good? 🤩 I will DM to ...
